Emerging and growth-leading economies

Emerging and growth-leading economies (EAGLEs) are the key emerging economies that are expected to lead global growth in the next decade.

Contents

The EAGLEs concept

EAGLEs is a grouping acronym created in late 2010 by BBVA Research to identify all emerging economies, whose expected contribution to world’s gross domestic product (GDP) in the next ten years is expected to be larger than the average of the G7 economies, excluding the United States. This is a dynamic concept where country members can change over time according to their forecasted performance relative to developed economies. In a first approach ten economies, sorted by relevance, have been identified: China, India, Brazil, Indonesia, South Korea, Russia, Mexico, Egypt, Taiwan and Turkey.

EAGLEs and other economic concepts

As world economic growth rotates from developed to developing countries there has been increasing interest in identifying emerging markets that will become global leaders, as well as increasing lobbying of some countries to be included in the BRIC definition. However, many economists have argued that the BRIC concept (Brazil, Russia, India and China) is outdated and have proposed alternative definitions. The EAGLEs concept is similar to other proposals in going beyond BRICs (such as the CIVETS, Next 11 or 7 percent club) but its methodology differs from others’ in several ways:

There were several attempts over the years trying to implement the economic concept that will the best reflect the potential of emerging markets in the coming years. After coining the BRIC concept by the Goldman Sachs in 2001, there were other endeavors to find the best grouping acronym such as: CIVETS, Next Eleven, 7 per cent club and the EAGLEs.

In January 2011, Goldman Sachs decided to re-define its current definition of Emerging Markets and proposed a new term “Growth Markets”. The separation of Growth Markets from Emerging Markets is aimed to show the world’s most dynamic economies – those that are at least contributing 1 per cent to global growth (outside of the Developed World). In the first approach, eight economies have been identified and they were: BRIC economies plus Mexico, South Korea, Turkey and Indonesia. This particular shift in terminology was initially proposed by BBVA Research (later followed by Goldman Sachs) with the aim of switching from the existing static concept to something more dynamic, that could better indicate market potential.

Results

According to BBVA research forecasts, world’s incremental GDP in the current decade is anticipated to grow over US$41 trillion adjusted by purchasing power parity (PPP). EAGLEs share will be slightly above 50% whereas the G7 share will only reach 14%. As reported by BBVA research, China will play a key role during this decade representing almost 30% of total world growth; 2.4 times more than the other three BRIC countries. India and Brazil are expected to be the second and third highest contributors, followed by Indonesia and South Korea. Each will contribute to world growth more than Russia, and if combined they will be 1.5 times higher than Brazil. Next on the list is Mexico whose contribution is envisioned to surpass that of Germany or the UK, in spite of its current GDP size (adjusted by PPP) is only 53% and 71% respectively. Finally on the list there are: Egypt, Taiwan and Turkey whose Incremental GDP is predicted to be substantially larger than other developed economies, i.e., Canada, France and Italy.



EAGLEs: Size and Incremental GDP
Gross Domestic Product (USD PPP 2010 Trillion, Constant Prices)

Country 2010 2020 Incremental GDP
 China 10.1 22.7 12.6
 India 4.0 7.6 3.6
 Brazil 2.2 3.9 1.7
 Indonesia 1.0 2.0 0.9
 South Korea 1.5 2.2 0.7
 Russia 2.2 2.8 0.6
 Mexico 1.5 2.1 0.5
 Egypt 0.5 0.9 0.4
 Taiwan 0.8 1.2 0.4
 Turkey 1.0 1.4 0.4
EAGLEs average 2.5 4.6 2.1
 Japan 4.3 5.0 0.7
 Germany 2.9 3.4 0.4
 United Kingdom 2.2 2.6 0.4
 Canada 1.3 1.7 0.3
 France 2.1 2.5 0.3
 Italy 1.8 1.9 0.2
G6 average 2.4 2.8 0.4
 United States 14.6 18.2 3.6
G7 average 4.2 5.0 0.9

Watch list or the EAGLEs’ Nest

As part of the EAGLEs proposal, the EAGLEs’ Nest is a second set of countries with expected Incremental GDP in the next decade to be lower than the average of the G6 economies (G7 excluding the U.S.) but higher than Italy’s, the country which is anticipated to contribute least to global growth within the G7. The members are Thailand, Nigeria, Poland, Colombia, South Africa, Malaysia, Pakistan, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Argentina, Peru, and the Philippines. Altogether their Incremental GDP will be almost 8% of total world growth.

Country Average growth needed to

become an EAGLE (2010–2020)

The difference between

required and forecasted growth

 Thailand 5.5 0.3
 Poland 4.4 0.9
 Nigeria 7.5 1.0
 South Africa 5.6 1.4
 Colombia 6.6 1.5
 Argentina 5.2 1.6
 Malaysia 6.9 1.7
 Pakistan 6.2 1.8
 Vietnam 9.1 2.3
 Bangladesh 9.4 2.7
 Peru 9.3 3.4
 Philippines 7.8 3.5

Predictive lists of 50 largest economies by incremental GDP from 2010 to 2016

The following two tables are predictive lists of fifty largest economies by incremental GDP from 2010 to 2016 by International Monetary Fund. The EAGLEs and the EAGLEs' Nest are in bold.

Predictive List of Economies by Incremental Nominal GDP from 2010 to 2016[1] Predictive List of Economies by Incremental GDP (PPP) from 2010 to 2016[2]
Rank Country Incremental GDP (billions of US$)
  World 28,664.160
1  China 5,901.722
 European Union 4,808.275
2  United States 3,724.097
3  Russia 1,608.236
4  India 1,394.939
5  Japan 1,324.140
6  Brazil 1,282.701
7  United Kingdom 973.522
8  France 704.864
9  Indonesia 674.918
10  South Korea 671.361
11  Germany 642.659
12  Australia 571.037
13  Canada 528.798
14  Mexico 470.710
15  Italy 421.204
16  Turkey 397.580
17  Spain 353.651
18  Taiwan 337.235
19  Sweden 325.283
20  Saudi Arabia 288.458
21  Switzerland 237.156
22  Poland 224.310
23  Iran 222.480
24  Thailand 219.045
25  Netherlands 187.052
26  Argentina 179.994
27  Kazakhstan 177.049
28  South Africa 171.913
29  United Arab Emirates 162.645
30  Nigeria 156.766
31  Belgium 154.013
32  Colombia 141.267
33  Norway 132.653
 Hong Kong 130.731
34  Romania 127.647
35  Pakistan 126.254
36  Malaysia 123.778
37  Egypt 123.282
38  Austria 118.493
39  Ukraine 117.496
40  Singapore 115.901
41  Iraq 113.576
42  Chile 110.026
43  Philippines 107.757
44  Vietnam 106.628
45  Israel 97.163
46  Kuwait 91.198
47  Peru 89.127
48  Finland 87.761
49  Denmark 86.222
50  Qatar 83.776
Rank Country Incremental GDP (billions of US$)
  World 29,103.681
1  China 8,547.378
2  United States 3,724.097
 European Union 3,080.774
3  India 2,861.687
4  Russia 809.035
5  Brazil 787.335
6  Japan 744.838
7  Indonesia 609.759
8  Germany 538.678
9  South Korea 538.172
10  Mexico 514.450
11  United Kingdom 488.910
12  France 430.078
13  Taiwan 362.361
14  Turkey 353.993
15  Iran 313.617
16  Canada 306.830
17  Argentina 273.311
18  Australia 256.857
19  Saudi Arabia 254.129
20  Spain 246.887
21  Thailand 244.185
22  Poland 231.544
23  Italy 225.945
24  Nigeria 210.561
25  Egypt 190.444
26  Malaysia 186.781
27  Pakistan 180.020
28  Colombia 176.371
29  South Africa 176.073
30  Vietnam 166.087
31  Philippines 160.398
32  Bangladesh 151.617
33  Peru 144.616
 Hong Kong 134.821
34  Netherlands 126.172
35  Ukraine 119.600
36  Singapore 113.837
37  Chile 111.057
38  Sweden 109.062
39  Kazakhstan 106.157
40  Iraq 103.853
41  Qatar 90.861
42  United Arab Emirates 89.338
43  Venezuela 84.029
44  Romania 82.652
45  Belgium 79.801
46  Algeria 78.608
47  Israel 76.833
48  Austria 73.168
49  Morocco 68.730
50  Czech Republic 66.693

Controversy

Arising controversy around the BRIC acronym entailed debate about the drawbacks assigned to a measurement of the economic significance for emerging markets. Indeed, South Africa is unquestionably a key African market but is it enough powerful to make it to a BRIC group? On the contrary, Egypt could be considered to be a better take, even though its economy is relatively smaller but is expected to deliver more to the world’s growth in the coming years. Eventually, current political instability triggered black clouds above its economy that could result in losing its position as an EAGLE member.

The effects of the political turmoil in Egypt

The Egyptian economy has performed better than others in Africa over the last twenty years, driven mainly by a dynamic population and stable institutional environment (regarding policy and regulatory framework), guaranteed by the Hosni Mubarak regime. With recent changes in events, it is too early to assess its possible impact on the long term growth rate of this country. The experience of previous cases obviously offers only limited guidance, but it does suggest that the peaceful democratic transitions usually generate positive or neutral effects on growth. Possible fall out of the EAGLEs’ group is significant due to contractions in its activity but on the other hand falling out of Nest, would required a more severe shock which could only arise if the political transition will worsen triggering the collapse of the economy (e.g., civil war).
(To delve deeper into the case of Egypt, refer to Economic Watch Can Egypt continue to be an EAGLE? BBVA Research 16/03/2011)

Marketing

BBVA EAGLEs was presented on November 15, 2010. It has been referenced by the media world wide several times.

See also

Media

Media, both national and international, have covered the new concept coined by BBVA Research on emerging economies called EAGLEs.

Further readings

References

  1. ^ [1] IMF nominal GDP Data (September 2011)
  2. ^ [2] IMF GDP (PPP) Data (April 2011)

External links